<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans For Unions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:46:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Spartanburg Ostrich-Journal :: FITSNews</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-38405</link>
		<dc:creator>The Spartanburg Ostrich-Journal :: FITSNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/#comment-38405</guid>
		<description>[...] troubling, Walker sponsored legislation that would subsidize union activity in our state, basically forcing the taxpayers to pick up the accounting tab for a host of political [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] troubling, Walker sponsored legislation that would subsidize union activity in our state, basically forcing the taxpayers to pick up the accounting tab for a host of political [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold E. Karr</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-16428</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnold E. Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/#comment-16428</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll try to say this without making personal remarks that have nothing to do with the issue:

1) Every public employees&#039; professional association in S.C. except The SCEA (and PSTA, I surmise) enjoys the convenience of payroll deducted dues.
2) Taxpayers would not incur any cost from payroll deduction of union dues, any more than they do from payroll deduction of United Way contributions, State Employees&#039;s Association dues, law enforcement and correctional association dues -- the list goes on and on.
3) NEA and The SCEA membership dues, like all union dues, may not be used for political action. Members may voluntarily contribute to PAC funds, but these contributions are not a requirement for membership.
4) Public employees in S.C. have neither collective bargaining rights, nor the right to strike, whether they belong to a union or not. The union serves to inform them of their rights (of which the state would often prefer they remain ignorant), to assist them in asserting those rights through internal grievance procedures and civil actions when informal resolution fails, and to lobby for legislation that guarantees competitive salaries, benefits, and working conditions.
5) Teachers who choose not to belong to the union benefit from the union&#039;s lobbying activities at the membership&#039;s expense. Most union members in S.C. that I know accept this as the cost of doing business in a &quot;right to work&quot; state and hope that non-members will in time do their part for the profession as a whole.

I hope I have been able to clear up some misconceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll try to say this without making personal remarks that have nothing to do with the issue:</p>
<p>1) Every public employees&#8217; professional association in S.C. except The SCEA (and PSTA, I surmise) enjoys the convenience of payroll deducted dues.<br />
2) Taxpayers would not incur any cost from payroll deduction of union dues, any more than they do from payroll deduction of United Way contributions, State Employees&#8217;s Association dues, law enforcement and correctional association dues &#8212; the list goes on and on.<br />
3) NEA and The SCEA membership dues, like all union dues, may not be used for political action. Members may voluntarily contribute to PAC funds, but these contributions are not a requirement for membership.<br />
4) Public employees in S.C. have neither collective bargaining rights, nor the right to strike, whether they belong to a union or not. The union serves to inform them of their rights (of which the state would often prefer they remain ignorant), to assist them in asserting those rights through internal grievance procedures and civil actions when informal resolution fails, and to lobby for legislation that guarantees competitive salaries, benefits, and working conditions.<br />
5) Teachers who choose not to belong to the union benefit from the union&#8217;s lobbying activities at the membership&#8217;s expense. Most union members in S.C. that I know accept this as the cost of doing business in a &#8220;right to work&#8221; state and hope that non-members will in time do their part for the profession as a whole.</p>
<p>I hope I have been able to clear up some misconceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Wondern</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-16377</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Wondern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/#comment-16377</guid>
		<description>#2 Clancy

    What in hell is a &quot;right to work state baby&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2 Clancy</p>
<p>    What in hell is a &#8220;right to work state baby&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gal Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-16367</link>
		<dc:creator>Gal Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/#comment-16367</guid>
		<description>#3:

If you in fact got fired after 19 years and were replaced by &quot;some college kid at a third of the cost&quot;  I encourage you to call a lawyer.  That is already agaisnt the law.

My guess, however, is that it didn&#039;t happen...but was offered as a badly needed boost for an otherwise specious argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3:</p>
<p>If you in fact got fired after 19 years and were replaced by &#8220;some college kid at a third of the cost&#8221;  I encourage you to call a lawyer.  That is already agaisnt the law.</p>
<p>My guess, however, is that it didn&#8217;t happen&#8230;but was offered as a badly needed boost for an otherwise specious argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reagan was a douchebag</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-16288</link>
		<dc:creator>Reagan was a douchebag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/#comment-16288</guid>
		<description>Not exactly, numnuts. it&#039;s so wrong that Unions &quot;Having proven unable to sustain itself on its own merits,&quot; lost influence because of their own merits...It was more like republican scumbags like Nixon, Reagan, and the Bushies systematically dismantled and circumvented labor laws in an effort to reward their rich elitist buddies on wallstreet at the expense of the working families of America.

And it shouldn&#039;t be called right to work, it should be call right be fired for no reason and with no recourse.

I hope someday you get fired from a job after 19 years just days before you qualify for your pension so they can hire some college kid at a third of the cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly, numnuts. it&#8217;s so wrong that Unions &#8220;Having proven unable to sustain itself on its own merits,&#8221; lost influence because of their own merits&#8230;It was more like republican scumbags like Nixon, Reagan, and the Bushies systematically dismantled and circumvented labor laws in an effort to reward their rich elitist buddies on wallstreet at the expense of the working families of America.</p>
<p>And it shouldn&#8217;t be called right to work, it should be call right be fired for no reason and with no recourse.</p>
<p>I hope someday you get fired from a job after 19 years just days before you qualify for your pension so they can hire some college kid at a third of the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clancy Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-16254</link>
		<dc:creator>Clancy Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/#comment-16254</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a sign for the fatty in the picture: &quot;Teachers NEED to get their sorry asses back to the school house and teach the chilluns before they get FIRED for insubordination.&quot; Welcome to a right to work state, baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a sign for the fatty in the picture: &#8220;Teachers NEED to get their sorry asses back to the school house and teach the chilluns before they get FIRED for insubordination.&#8221; Welcome to a right to work state, baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PalmettoPwnd</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-16234</link>
		<dc:creator>PalmettoPwnd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/04/01/republicans-for-unions/#comment-16234</guid>
		<description>The NEA spent $9.2 million on lobbying last year. Good to know that SC taxpayers will get a chance to help pay for that.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/5656808.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NEA spent $9.2 million on lobbying last year. Good to know that SC taxpayers will get a chance to help pay for that.<br />
<a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/5656808.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/5656808.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
