Ravenel Sentenced To Ten Months In Federal Prison
FORMER STATE TREASURER ALSO FINED $250,000
FITSNews – March 14, 2008 – Former State Treasurer Thomas Ravenel was sentenced to 10 months in federal prison and fined $250,000 today stemming from his June 2007 arrest on federal drug charges. Ravenel’s sentence will be delayed five months, however, giving his attorneys and federal prosecutors additional time to demonstrate his cooperation in ongoing investigations.
Ravenel’s jail sentence was identical to that of co-defendant Michael L. Miller, who in addition to facing federal drug charges along with Ravenel was also arrested in November of last year for striking a police officer. Miller had previously pled guilty to selling Ravenel cocaine, which the former Treasurer then provided to his friends at parties. Ravenel resigned his office in July of last year shortly after being indicted.Â
The sentences were handed down by U.S. District Court Judge Joseph F. Anderson after nearly five hours of testimony, including a statement from Ravenel in which he apologized to his family and to the people of South Carolina for his “unacceptable behavior and conduct.”
Ravenel, who has cooperated fully with authorities from the beginning and sought treatment for his drug problem, told the court that he hoped to be remembered not for his current crisis, but for how he has responded to that crisis. Both Ravenel’s attorneys and federal prosecutors lobbied for a reduced sentence, although it appears that efforts by the NAACP to frame the sentencing hearing along racial lines were successful.
Jeffrey Sewell, founder of SC Hotline, issued a blistering statement this afternoon on Judge Anderson’s ruling, saying “this is not justice – this is reverse discrimination at its worst.”
“Frankly, I think it’s a sad day when we let the NAACP or any other organization dictate terms to the federal bench – on a case that would have never been in the federal court system to begin with were it not for Thomas Ravenel’s prominent public position,” Sewell said in his statement.
At one point during the sentencing proceeding, Judge Anderson did acknowledge the fact that “it is somewhat rare to have powder cocaine cases in the federal court system.”
Another bizarre component of the sentencing revolved around a request by S.C. Common Cause director John Crangle that Ravenel be forced to pay the $28,000 costs of a special legislative session to elect his successor.
Crangle’s argument ignores the fact that the S.C. General Assembly proactively decided to hold a special session rather than permitting the governor’s interim appointment, Columbia attorney Ken Wingate, to serve as Treasurer until the legislature reconvened six months later. Additionally, the legislature took up several other matters of state business during its overtime session last summer.
Nonetheless, Judge Anderson adopted Crangle’s recommendation, although he incorporated the $28,000 restitution to the state within Ravenel’s quarter million dollar fine. Ravenel told FITSNews prior to his hearing that he had been ”ready and willing” to pay the restitution regardless of the Judge’s ruling, but that his attorneys had been awaiting clarification from the court regarding whether or not he could legally do so.Â
Crangle disputed the contention that the General Assembly made a choice to hold the special session, telling FITSNews “it was (Ravenel’s) drug use that resulted in this cost.”
A review of legislative journals, however, reveals that the General Assembly specifically inserted language into its adjournment resolution last year requiring the special session in the event Ravenel stepped down. Such a move was neither constitutionally or statutorily-mandated.Â






Comments
By Bird on March 14th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
A noble response — especially after being thrown in the middle of a premeditated pile of hooey.
By WFM on March 14th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
The “crisis” Ravenel refers to is more commonly refered to as an addiction or habit. How would he have “responded” if he hadnt been caught?
By Francis on March 14th, 2008 at 5:24 pm
1 in 100 Americans in jail, 1 in 15 African Americans. We cannot stop drugs from crossing our borders or folks from self medicating how will we stop the next Nuke? Today we saw political injustice at its worst the bench afraid of the NAACP put away a guy that told the truth Ravenel from day one, employs hundreds of people at the cost of the coastal economy while fining him 250k because he could afford it??? Miller, nadda, where is the justice in any of this bazzare turn of events?
By Mincing Words on March 14th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
WTF? I am as big a Republican as they come. But this case is complete bullshit. I think TRav is unfit for public office (anyone with nose candy problem-or other impairing addictions, for that matter- is unfit), but for God’s sake, 10 months in federal prison? For purchasing cocaine?
And for all you race mongers out there, just chill the f%&* out. I don’t think that ANY USER ought to be serving a sentence like this.
This is Martha Stewart all over again. Probably the first American ever who served a sentence for lying to the cops when interrogated. How about every freakin defendant ever questioned? How many have ever told the whole truth? 3?
By Hmmmm.... on March 14th, 2008 at 8:31 pm
Jeffrey Sewell’s stupidity is showing. He’s right about one thing — this case would have not been in federal court if not for Ravenel’s prominent public position. Ol’ Jeffrey should ask Ravenel — since he’s got five months to cool his heels — if he would have wanted the case to be tried in state court. Because it was in federal court, Ravenel avoided some SERIOUS jail time.
By Mr. Blackwell on March 14th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
This sentence is truly unbelievable and sickening. Over-crowded prisons and our tax dollars are paying to imprison non violent offenders like Ravenal every day.
Come on. He did some coke and gave it to friends. Should he have stayed in public office? Of course not. Should he be going to federal prison OR paying a fine for it? Hell NO!
By old bike dude on March 14th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
And now the Ravenel sentencing theme song:
Nothin’ from nothin’ leaves nothin’
You gotta have somethin’ if you wanna be with me
Nothin’ from nothin’ leaves nothin’
You gotta have somethin’ if you wanna be with me
I’m not tryin’ to be your hero
‘Cause that zero is too cold for me, Brrr
I’m not tryin’ to be your highness
‘Cause that minus is too low to see, yeah
Nothin’ from nothin’ leaves nothin’
And I’m not stuffin’, believe you me
Don’t you remember I told ya
I’m a soldier in the war on poverty, yeah
Yes, I am
By sc@comcast.com on March 15th, 2008 at 9:24 am
The Charleston paper said he was helping the investigation of the “Broad Street Bar” scene? It appears that is why he was given 5 extra months to demonstrate cooperation. So who are the others being investigated? If you want your Pulitzer, crack that story. ; D
As to the rest of the story, does anyone else see how foolish it is to dedicate so many public resources (jail space, prosecutor time, police manpower, tax dollars) to criminalizing this disease? Obviously we don’t need our elected officials doped up, but this has exceeded that scope.
By Palmetto Patriot on March 15th, 2008 at 10:06 am
It serves no public policy goal to lock up T-Rav. It is a shame he is even dealing with the US Attorney, if his name were Thomas Smith he never would have faced a single charge state or federal, period. I am most disappointed with, what appears to be, his willingness to become complicit in this hit job by naming names.
By Oh, you're kidding, right? on March 15th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
The amount Ravenel was reportedly caught with (varying news sources, 100+g) carried a max sentence of about 20 years, even for first timers; under state law, a *mandatory* 25 (if it was really over 100g). The amount his plea agreement to was much lower (like 10g), but in state court still could’ve gotten 3 years as first timer.
Take a second to look at http://www.ussc.gov/2007guid/GL2007.pdf . (The quantity tables start on p138 and the sentencing table is on 392.) The state guidelines are under SC Code 44-53-370, http://scstatehouse.net/code/t44c053.htm.
I don’t think Ravenel should be serving a 10 month sentence, either, but it’s because I think the whole “War on Drugs” itself serves “no public policy” in its current incarnation, as opposed to just the individual punishment of Ravenel.
By justin on March 15th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Wow. After reading this I feel bad for Ravenel. He is the true victim in this case. Gosh, he was only trying to have a good time. He only bought 100 grams. He must have some type of “disease”. Poor, poor man. Maybe we should reinstate him as treasurer.
By abc on March 16th, 2008 at 10:41 am
To hmmm– the Judge and Ravenels attorneys agreed that if Ravenel were in State Court he would have gotten PTI- pretrial intervention AKA probation
By abc on March 16th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
“Oh, you’re kidding, right? – March 15, 2008
…The amount Ravenel was reportedly caught with…” You are sooooo ignorant of the facts, dude! He was not “caught with” ANYTHING! and you didn’t READ that in ANY news source, you fool! You wet-dreamed it! Get up on the FACTS before posting. Go play with your Transformers Computer Game!
By Jonathan Richards on March 21st, 2008 at 4:13 am
This is another example of wasted tax dollars. He will spend ten months in a Federal Prison Camp. Not comfortable, but hardly Pelican Bay. No fence. All non-violent offenders- mostly drug and white collar. We, the taxpayer will dish out over $200 a day for every day he is there. The Federal system in the US needs revision. In many other civilized nations, no jail time would be given. They realize that public funds can be spent in better ways and overcrowding prisons with minor drug offenders is no solution.
Jonathan Richards
http://www.federal-prison.org