<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Sealed Documents &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11452</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11452</guid>
		<description>One reason might be that there are minor children and the adults in question are high-profile.  This protects the children from coming to school one day to find out &quot;your daddy is on drugs&quot; or &quot;your momma is a ho&quot; after some reporter decided to make hay of someone&#039;s divorce files and half their school learned about it via the six o&#039;clock news.

That&#039;s a motive I understand, and would wholeheartedly sympathize with.  Indeed, Rep. Scarborough does have minor children.  Perhaps, if the files are sealed, this might be the reason.

But my life&#039;s too busy these days to go snooping through divorce files.  I&#039;ve got a couple of divorces to my name and anyone&#039;s divorces just become a little more heartbreak and depression than I really want to deal with.

However, in the grand scheme of things, what does a messy divorce really have to do with the bigger issues of this state?  A lesson of the 1998 Clinton impeachment proceedings is that while some people think this stuff matters, there are a lot of people who don&#039;t.

Majority wins ... and on this issue, I&#039;m willing to bet that a majority just doesn&#039;t care, like it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One reason might be that there are minor children and the adults in question are high-profile.  This protects the children from coming to school one day to find out &#8220;your daddy is on drugs&#8221; or &#8220;your momma is a ho&#8221; after some reporter decided to make hay of someone&#8217;s divorce files and half their school learned about it via the six o&#8217;clock news.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a motive I understand, and would wholeheartedly sympathize with.  Indeed, Rep. Scarborough does have minor children.  Perhaps, if the files are sealed, this might be the reason.</p>
<p>But my life&#8217;s too busy these days to go snooping through divorce files.  I&#8217;ve got a couple of divorces to my name and anyone&#8217;s divorces just become a little more heartbreak and depression than I really want to deal with.</p>
<p>However, in the grand scheme of things, what does a messy divorce really have to do with the bigger issues of this state?  A lesson of the 1998 Clinton impeachment proceedings is that while some people think this stuff matters, there are a lot of people who don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Majority wins &#8230; and on this issue, I&#8217;m willing to bet that a majority just doesn&#8217;t care, like it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Believe It Not (a.k.a. Sic Willie's Stalker)</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11400</link>
		<dc:creator>Believe It Not (a.k.a. Sic Willie's Stalker)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11400</guid>
		<description>Harden,

Post those pictures. Please and thank you!

BIN News</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harden,</p>
<p>Post those pictures. Please and thank you!</p>
<p>BIN News</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harden Gervais</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11378</link>
		<dc:creator>Harden Gervais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11378</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re nuts. These documents have been public for some time. I even know a guy that has them, complete with photos of Ceips and Scarborough getting into their cars after a tryst.

Any effort to seal them is way too late â€“ that horse has left the barn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re nuts. These documents have been public for some time. I even know a guy that has them, complete with photos of Ceips and Scarborough getting into their cars after a tryst.</p>
<p>Any effort to seal them is way too late â€“ that horse has left the barn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmmm....</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11377</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmmmm....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11377</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a big difference between grand jury testimony and a divorce decree. There are all kinds of legitmate reasons for sealing grand jury testimony. But a divorce decree? Not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a big difference between grand jury testimony and a divorce decree. There are all kinds of legitmate reasons for sealing grand jury testimony. But a divorce decree? Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mincing Words</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11375</link>
		<dc:creator>Mincing Words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11375</guid>
		<description>BIN,

does journalistic proof require more than two witnesses?  even in a criminal court, &quot;proof beyond a reasonable doubt&quot; could most certainly be satisfied by two witnesses or less...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIN,</p>
<p>does journalistic proof require more than two witnesses?  even in a criminal court, &#8220;proof beyond a reasonable doubt&#8221; could most certainly be satisfied by two witnesses or less&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Believe It Not (a.k.a. Sic Willie's Stalker)</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11372</link>
		<dc:creator>Believe It Not (a.k.a. Sic Willie's Stalker)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11372</guid>
		<description>Editorial Note:  BIN News is deeply offended that sic(k) willie has begun to add &quot;a.k.a. Sic Willie&#039;s Stalker&quot; to the header of our posts.

We consistently track sic(k) willie&#039;s posts on this blog, and, from time to time, we receive unsolicited input from his &quot;friends and family&quot; about his nefarious dealings and activities. But, we&#039;re not &quot;stalkers.&quot;

We leave that to &quot;The Boys from Charlotte&quot; who have time and $$$.

Sincerely,
BIN News Editorial Staff

P.S. If anyone knows who&#039;s paying &quot;The Boys,&quot;  please let us know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editorial Note:  BIN News is deeply offended that sic(k) willie has begun to add &#8220;a.k.a. Sic Willie&#8217;s Stalker&#8221; to the header of our posts.</p>
<p>We consistently track sic(k) willie&#8217;s posts on this blog, and, from time to time, we receive unsolicited input from his &#8220;friends and family&#8221; about his nefarious dealings and activities. But, we&#8217;re not &#8220;stalkers.&#8221;</p>
<p>We leave that to &#8220;The Boys from Charlotte&#8221; who have time and $$$.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
BIN News Editorial Staff</p>
<p>P.S. If anyone knows who&#8217;s paying &#8220;The Boys,&#8221;  please let us know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Believe It Not (a.k.a. Sic Willie's Stalker)</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11344</link>
		<dc:creator>Believe It Not (a.k.a. Sic Willie's Stalker)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11344</guid>
		<description>sic(k) willie, 

Do you have proof of anything improper, or are you just slinging mud again?  Do you have pictures, video, audio or more than 2 witnesses?

No. Just another willie-scam.  Like your post full of screwed up links.

sic(k) willie, were you drunk (again) when you created this post with all links pointing to sportsillustrated.cnn.com or just sloppy? 

Come on willie, do the right thing and just turn this into a porn site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sic(k) willie, </p>
<p>Do you have proof of anything improper, or are you just slinging mud again?  Do you have pictures, video, audio or more than 2 witnesses?</p>
<p>No. Just another willie-scam.  Like your post full of screwed up links.</p>
<p>sic(k) willie, were you drunk (again) when you created this post with all links pointing to sportsillustrated.cnn.com or just sloppy? </p>
<p>Come on willie, do the right thing and just turn this into a porn site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old bike dude</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11342</link>
		<dc:creator>old bike dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 01:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/03/01/on-sealed-documents/#comment-11342</guid>
		<description>I think if we go inside the numbers that Bonds and Scarborough match up pretty evenly. While Bonds obviously had more homers, Scarborough had more scores and less strike outs. Scarborough could probably take a few lessons from Barry on improving his long game while Wallace could hold school on covering the field, playing on the road, and putting away the competition. Why the two of them remained unsigned is quite the mystery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if we go inside the numbers that Bonds and Scarborough match up pretty evenly. While Bonds obviously had more homers, Scarborough had more scores and less strike outs. Scarborough could probably take a few lessons from Barry on improving his long game while Wallace could hold school on covering the field, playing on the road, and putting away the competition. Why the two of them remained unsigned is quite the mystery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

