FITSNews Exclusive – Consultant’s Miscalculation Cost Sanford VP Slot
ADVISOR’S FLIRTATION WITH GIULIANI DICTATED GOVERNOR’S DECISION TO RENEGE ON McCAIN ENDORSEMENT
FITSNews – February 16, 2008 – During the 2000 Republican Primary, there was no stronger Palmetto State advocate for Sen. John McCain’s presidential bid than an up-and-coming U.S. Congressman named Mark Sanford. Both politicians were labeled as “mavericks,” and both gleefully bucked the status quo with fiercely independent voices articulating a new brand of Republicanism, one that was sadly a few years away from gaining widespread popular appeal in the buckle of the Bible Belt.
Of course McCain’s 2000 defeat, bitter and caustic as it was, paved the way for Sanford’s gubernatorial victory two years later. By that time, the same cookie cutter negative campaigning and overt pandering to evangelical voters that worked so well against McCain fell flat against him, overshadowed by pocketbook concerns set against the backdrop of a sluggish national economy.
Sanford and his fiscal conservative message rolled to victory, and by his third year in the governor’s office – which we’ll get to in a moment – he had built a political cult of personality unrivaled in the state. In 2006, he rode that cult to a landslide reelection victory – despite the fact that his administration had failed to pass any of his major legislative initiatives. Within the political power structure at the State House, Sanford’s adeptness at grabbing headlines at the expense of his legislative antagonists had rendered him completely impotent in terms of getting anything done. But outside of the State House, he was the most popular politician since former Gov. Carroll Campbell, and by far and away the most coveted 2008 presidential endorsement in early-voting South Carolina.
But who would Sanford back for the highest office in the land? And more importantly, how would he leverage his tremendous political capital to further his own national political ambitions?
Since 2005, Sanford’s political calculations have been determined almost exclusively by one man, Washington D.C.-based political consultant Jon Lerner, who also advises the South Carolina Republican Party and who previously advised Spartanburg businesswoman Karen Floyd in her failed bid for State Superintendent of Education.
It was Lerner who counseled the governor beginning in early 2005 to back off of a previous promise he had made to McCain to “be there (for McCain) when the time was right.” In other words, once Sanford had been safely reelected, he would be free to throw his support behind the Arizona Senator, who to this day remains wildly unpopular with the evangelical wing of the South Carolina GOP.
McCain and Sanford have both denied to FITSNews that any such promise was made, but numerous sources within the two politicians’ organizations have confirmed it. In fact, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham – arguably McCain’s most influential 2008 endorsement – is said to have reminded Sanford of his previous commitment to McCain during a meeting between the two politicians shortly before this year’s primary vote.
By that time, however, the governor’s consultant had already made it impossible for Sanford to endorse McCain.
That’s because Lerner, who has a history of running races in New York State, had for months been angling to get a prominent consulting spot in former GOP frontrunner Rudy Giuliani’s organization, and sources tell FITSNews that a deal had already been cut for Sanford to endorse Giuliani in exchange for a spot on his national ticket. And, of course, a nice consulting contract for Lerner.
Politically, it made sense. At the time Lerner’s deal was reportedly struck, Giuliani was leading the GOP field in most national polls and McCain’s presidential ship appeared sunk.
But an amazing string of events – the improbable rise of Mike Huckabee, the collapse of Mitt Romney, the lackluster showing of Fred Thompson and Giuliani’s failed strategy of ignoring Iowa and New Hampshire – all conspired to bring McCain’s once-doomed candidacy back from the dead.
Left holding his suddenly-deflated Giuliani V.P. bag, Sanford was given one final chance to endorse McCain (at his January 2008 meeting with Lindsey Graham), but again passed on doing so based on Lerner’s advice.
According to Sanford insiders, Lerner once again counseled against a McCain endorsement, in large part because the likelihood of a vice-presidential slot with McCain had evaporated due to governor’s prior indecisiveness.
More importantly, though, the prospect of Lindsey Graham taking a Cabinet position in McCain’s administration meant the possibility of an open U.S. Senate seat, something the governor is said to covet.
A special election for U.S. Senate would confront Sanford with the same electoral math he faced in his 2006 reelection for the governor, meaning the risk of alienating a potential base of support would far outweigh the benefit of a spot on McCain’s shortlist, which is all that was being offered in exchange for the governor’s “Johnny-come-lately” endorsement.
In a recent post on the pro-McCain website The Palmetto Scoop, author Adam Fogle writes that “Sanford’s post-gubernatorial ambitions of seeking a larger office have been left out in the cold. If Sanford had any delusions about being vice president, they’re now gone. He has lost a rare opportunity to become a major player on the national scene and keep South Carolina in the limelight.”
We couldn’t agree more … and now you know why that’s the case.






Comments
By jared fogle on February 16th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
you spelled cabinet wrong
By Rob W. on February 16th, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Not to beat up the fiscal conservatives here, but after looking at the trend for the past 2 years, would a Sanford/Demint Senate delegation leave South Carolina with one of the least influential pair of senators in the country? Or would Sanford have more influence on the U.S. Senate than he did on the S.C. Senate?
For the record, I’d be happy to have two fiscal conservative senators who would refuse to use earmarks to bring home the bacon for South Carolina (particularly if they espouse small government positions supporting immigration, homosexual marriage, and civil liberties). I mean, what right do South Carolinians have to get back 1.35 for every dollar they send to Washington? Alas, I feel I might be in the minority in this case.
By Michael on February 16th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Would there be a “special” election for US Senate? I thought the Governor appoints someone to fills the spot until the next election.
So that means, Graham is re-elected in 2008, takes a spot in the Administration and Sanford appoints himself US Senator for a full 6 year term?
That is how it would have to fall, no?
By marlboro on February 16th, 2008 at 6:55 pm
No, the way it would have to play out has happened once before. You need to look historically at what occured upon the death of Sen. Olin D. Johnson.
At that time, Donald Russell was Governor of the state and Robert McNair was Lt. Governor. Russell wanted to go the US Senate but the governor of this state may not appoint himself to fill the unexpired term, so he met with McNair and cooked up a deal.
There were approximately two and one half years left on Russell and McNair’s terms, respectively.
Russell decided to resign and give McNair the Governor’s office on the strict provision that Mcnair would make Russell US Senator.
This happened and McNair became the first Governor in our history to “technically” serve two terms.
So if Graham is reelected and takes a position as a cabinet official in the McCain administration Sanford would have to cut a deal with Bauer to make it so.
By Carrie on February 16th, 2008 at 8:52 pm
All one has to remmember is that Mark Sanford will do anything… for Mark Sanford.
Every statement and every action, is designed to “play” at a later date. He has used the governors office to HIS advantage. We suffer for that in the form of a crappier government, and higher taxes.
But hey, Sanford is happy. He gets the gold, we get the shaft.
By Harden Gervais on February 16th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
From what I hear, Bauer and the Gov aren’t exactly on the best of terms. Then again, Sanford pretty much stabs everyone in the back eventually, so if Andre could get the top spot, he might go for the deal.
By Oh grow up on February 17th, 2008 at 10:14 am
Thank God for Jon Lerner. Now let’s pray that Lindsey Graham cares too much about South Carolina to leave us with two completely irrelevant navel-gazers in the U.S. Senate. Or that Obama wins.
By someone on February 17th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Don’t listen to TPS. Sanford may even be clueless about how bad those guys hate him for campaigning for Ryberg in ‘06. They say he promised them he wouldn’t do that, among other things.
There are rumblings as recently as Friday morning from the very heart of the national McCain establishment that they want Sanford. If you saw Meet the Press this morning, you probably noticed how it even kept coming up on there.
McCain’s going to keep shifting left. He’ll lose in November in a landslide… unless he nominates a legitimate hardright’er for VP. Sanford is the only real conservative in the SC State House.
By Wondering on February 17th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
How will Sanford defend his record? It is horrid.
Me thinks the national media will rip him apart. Ala Dan Quayle, but without the personality.
That Sanford quasi-libertarian crap only plays with the Ron Paul crazies, plus a few that read that Friedman book. I read it, but forgot most of it as it was wishy wishy wannbe upper east side, please think I am smart bunk.
Can we just skip the election, save the money, and accept that the republican pary is leaderless?
By CL on February 18th, 2008 at 8:05 am
McCain’s brand of Republicanism is nothing new, its called liberalism.
By Chris on February 18th, 2008 at 11:02 am
To defend a record, one must have a record to begin with…
By Coke Stevenson on February 20th, 2008 at 2:08 am
The Senate appointee would serve until the next general election, not the full six year term.
Need an example? Strom Thurmond resigned his Senate seat in the Spring of 1956 to fulfill a campaign promise to be elected as a Democrat. A senator was appointed and served until Thurmond was elected in the 1956 election as a Democrat.
Thus, IF McCain wins, and IF he appoints Senator Graham to a post, whomever is appointed to the Senate will serve until a new senator is elected in 2010.
If Sanford wants the seat, he might be advised to appoint a caretaker and run for the seat in 2010. With relations as chilly as they are between the Lite Gov and the Gov, the Lite Gov just might appoint someone else upon the resignation and laugh his behind off.
Can’t you see Andre Bauer standing at the mike and announcing new US Senator Jake Knotts?
By John Learner Sux on March 27th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
John Learner sucks at consulting and loses more races than anybody.
Trackbacks