Comments on: Inside the Inquisition http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/ Unfair ... Imbalanced Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:38:09 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: mark santos http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-40396 mark santos Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:18:33 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-40396 The Bible and Inquisition Ex.22:17 and Ex.22:18. Ev. and kath. Bible Inquisition: Womansextermination: 9.000.000 Inquisition in Europa and in U.S.A. Inquisition in the Bible, in ev. Church and kath. Church Inquisition and Jesus: Matriarchat and Patriarchat Inquisition and Bibles Patriarchat The Bible and Menstruation as bloody and durty blood The woman as witch in the Bible? Ex.22:17. Martin Luther talk about Ex.22:17. Menstruation as Problem in the Bible Fighting between Jesus and Woman`s blood in the Bible Atheist! The Bible and Inquisition
Ex.22:17 and Ex.22:18. Ev. and kath. Bible
Inquisition: Womansextermination: 9.000.000
Inquisition in Europa and in U.S.A.
Inquisition in the Bible, in ev. Church and kath. Church
Inquisition and Jesus: Matriarchat and Patriarchat
Inquisition and Bibles Patriarchat
The Bible and Menstruation as bloody and durty blood
The woman as witch in the Bible? Ex.22:17.
Martin Luther talk about Ex.22:17.
Menstruation as Problem in the Bible
Fighting between Jesus and Woman`s blood in the Bible

Atheist!

]]> By: SC Supreme Court Faces Multiple Investigations | FITSNews http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-36045 SC Supreme Court Faces Multiple Investigations | FITSNews Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:01:32 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-36045 [...] decisions by the court’s controversial attorney discipline office have sparked at least two investigations - one by State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) officials [...] [...] decisions by the court’s controversial attorney discipline office have sparked at least two investigations – one by State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) officials [...]

]]> By: wrong http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-7939 wrong Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:07:25 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-7939 Condesecending lawyer wrote: "The procedure was similar to if you file suit in magistrate’s court, the magistrate rules against you, and you get to appeal to the common pleas court for a de novo review." A ruling in Magistrate's Court is not given a de novo review in the Court of Common Pleas. The Magistrate files a Return, along with an audiotape of the proceedings below and the Circuit Court Judge rules based on objections to errors of law raised during the trial. Condesecending lawyer wrote:

“The procedure was similar to if you file suit in magistrate’s court, the magistrate rules against you, and you get to appeal to the common pleas court for a de novo review.”

A ruling in Magistrate’s Court is not given a de novo review in the Court of Common Pleas. The Magistrate files a Return, along with an audiotape of the proceedings below and the Circuit Court Judge rules based on objections to errors of law raised during the trial.

]]> By: SC Lawyer http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-7899 SC Lawyer Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:08:40 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-7899 One USC professor has a few things to say. See http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=2854. Also, a story ran in the Post & Courier: http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/jan/23/fellow_judges_deny_kosko_new_term28361/ One USC professor has a few things to say. See http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=2854. Also, a story ran in the Post & Courier: http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/jan/23/fellow_judges_deny_kosko_new_term28361/

]]> By: Another SC Lawyer http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-7880 Another SC Lawyer Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:30:48 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-7880 Still waiting on the commentary about fello CSOL board member Kosko http://www.thestate.com/monk/story/289866.html Still waiting on the commentary about fello CSOL board member Kosko http://www.thestate.com/monk/story/289866.html

]]> By: Jerry McDougal, Esq. http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-7866 Jerry McDougal, Esq. Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:49:09 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-7866 You can't sleep with your clients? Oh man, that's only way I get laid. I always give ma ladies plenty of due process though. You can’t sleep with your clients? Oh man, that’s only way I get laid. I always give ma ladies plenty of due process though.

]]> By: Pete http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-7865 Pete Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:49:15 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-7865 #4 Amazed: It is quite obvious you have never been involved in the SC attorney discipline process or either you are Warren Tompkins, Queen Jean's paid lobbyist. There is no due process. Poll any number of lawyers who have been involved in even one case with the ODC. The Commission sees only what the ODC allows it to see at the sole discretion of the ODC. Respondent attorneys are not even allowed to know the names of the members of investigative panels, much less have an opportunity to make a fair presentation. What would really help this process would be an open hearing/ forum/ seminar to discuss what Rule 413 really means and how it is implemented. What the public would learn is that Rule 3 gives the Commission authority over all investigations, then Rules 4 and 5 make the ODC fully in charge and even delegates all the duties of the Commission back to the ODC. And #4 Amazed: I would be more than happy to debate the honesty, integrity and competence of the ODC staff at the public place and forum of your choosing. #4 Amazed: It is quite obvious you have never been involved in the SC attorney discipline process or either you are Warren Tompkins, Queen Jean’s paid lobbyist. There is no due process. Poll any number of lawyers who have been involved in even one case with the ODC. The Commission sees only what the ODC allows it to see at the sole discretion of the ODC. Respondent attorneys are not even allowed to know the names of the members of investigative panels, much less have an opportunity to make a fair presentation. What would really help this process would be an open hearing/ forum/ seminar to discuss what Rule 413 really means and how it is implemented. What the public would learn is that Rule 3 gives the Commission authority over all investigations, then Rules 4 and 5 make the ODC fully in charge and even delegates all the duties of the Commission back to the ODC. And #4 Amazed: I would be more than happy to debate the honesty, integrity and competence of the ODC staff at the public place and forum of your choosing.

]]> By: fitsnews http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-7862 fitsnews Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:36:09 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-7862 All we're saying is that the system is messed up when people get credit for stuff they weren't able to prove. Again, we agree with the Court's decision in this case, but the bigger issue is the potential for abuse of a system that pretty much allows the Court to end the career of any lawyer, any time over anything. No wonder nobody spoke out against the Court over the bar exam scam! Also, we think the fact that lawmakers have proposed doing away with the Court's oversight of this profession (based in large part on our reporting) speaks to the "meat" left on this bone. -FITSNews All we’re saying is that the system is messed up when people get credit for stuff they weren’t able to prove. Again, we agree with the Court’s decision in this case, but the bigger issue is the potential for abuse of a system that pretty much allows the Court to end the career of any lawyer, any time over anything.

No wonder nobody spoke out against the Court over the bar exam scam!

Also, we think the fact that lawmakers have proposed doing away with the Court’s oversight of this profession (based in large part on our reporting) speaks to the “meat” left on this bone.

-FITSNews

]]> By: happydaddy http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-7861 happydaddy Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:00:27 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-7861 Will: I'm sorry to say that #1 is essentially correct. Will:

I’m sorry to say that #1 is essentially correct.

]]> By: Believe It Not http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-7855 Believe It Not Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:37:29 +0000 http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/22/inside-the-inquisition/#comment-7855 Condescending Lawyer makes a very good point. sic(k) willie needs "basic...skills" before he tries to act or sound like a lawyer. He gives us all a bad name. Hold on readers - all both of you!! So what's the difference between a lawyer and attorney? The fee! Let's say you have 10,000 lawyers buried up to their necks in sand. What do you need? More sand!! A ship sinks. Thousands go into the sea. Sharks eat all but the lawyers. Why not them? Professional courtesy!!! We got a million of them. But here's the one that compares lawyers to political consultants - God Bless us all!! A businessman was trying to choose a lawyer, but was being very careful. He scheduled appointments to interview three lawyers. At the first lawyer's office the businessman said, "Okay, let's get down to business. I have an important question, and I want you to think carefully before answering. How much is two plus two?" The lawyer said, "Two plus two is four." The businessman thanked him, and proceeded to his next appointment. The second lawyer was also a CPA, and he seemed to be a bit more particular. After a discussion, the businessman again announced he had an important question, and asked, "How much is two plus two?" The second lawyer went to a computer and entered figures into a spreadsheet before saying, "According to my calculations, two plus two is approximately four." The businessman thanked him for his time, and proceeded to his next appointment. The third lawyer sat behind a big mahogany desk smoking a big fat Cuban (illegal) cigar. He seemed rather self-important as compared to the other two, but at the same time he appeared much more successful. (Eat your heart out, sic(k) willie!!) The businessman again announced, "I would like you to answer a very important question for me, before I decide whether I should use your services. How much is two plus two?" The lawyer turned off the lights, pulled the shades, locked his office door, and axed in a hushed voice, "How much do you want it to be?" Condescending Lawyer makes a very good point. sic(k) willie needs “basic…skills” before he tries to act or sound like a lawyer. He gives us all a bad name. Hold on readers – all both of you!!

So what’s the difference between a lawyer and attorney? The fee!

Let’s say you have 10,000 lawyers buried up to their necks in sand. What do you need? More sand!!

A ship sinks. Thousands go into the sea. Sharks eat all but the lawyers. Why not them? Professional courtesy!!!

We got a million of them.

But here’s the one that compares lawyers to political consultants – God Bless us all!!

A businessman was trying to choose a lawyer, but was being very careful. He scheduled appointments to interview three lawyers.

At the first lawyer’s office the businessman said, “Okay, let’s get down to business. I have an important question, and I want you to think carefully before answering. How much is two plus two?”

The lawyer said, “Two plus two is four.” The businessman thanked him, and proceeded to his next appointment.

The second lawyer was also a CPA, and he seemed to be a bit more particular. After a discussion, the businessman again announced he had an important question, and asked, “How much is two plus two?”

The second lawyer went to a computer and entered figures into a spreadsheet before saying, “According to my calculations, two plus two is approximately four.” The businessman thanked him for his time, and proceeded to his next appointment.

The third lawyer sat behind a big mahogany desk smoking a big fat Cuban (illegal) cigar. He seemed rather self-important as compared to the other two, but at the same time he appeared much more successful. (Eat your heart out, sic(k) willie!!)

The businessman again announced, “I would like you to answer a very important question for me, before I decide whether I should use your services. How much is two plus two?”

The lawyer turned off the lights, pulled the shades, locked his office door, and axed in a hushed voice, “How much do you want it to be?”

]]>