<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside The Mind of Mark Sanford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Our Stupid Laws Aren&#8217;t Working &#124; FITSNews For Now</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-20945</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Stupid Laws Aren&#8217;t Working &#124; FITSNews For Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-20945</guid>
		<description>[...] - May 9, 2008 - Three years ago, S.C. Governor Mark Sanford signed into law a new tort reform bill, an event we remember distinctly because the dumbass forget [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - May 9, 2008 - Three years ago, S.C. Governor Mark Sanford signed into law a new tort reform bill, an event we remember distinctly because the dumbass forget [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC A "No-Fly Zone" For Real ID &#124; FITSNews For Now</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-16014</link>
		<dc:creator>SC A "No-Fly Zone" For Real ID &#124; FITSNews For Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-16014</guid>
		<description>[...] - March 31, 2008 - South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford will not ask the federal government for more time to comply with a controversial Real ID law, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - March 31, 2008 - South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford will not ask the federal government for more time to comply with a controversial Real ID law, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCain's Secret Gameplan &#124; FITSNews For Now</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-15453</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain's Secret Gameplan &#124; FITSNews For Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-15453</guid>
		<description>[...] Gov. Mark Sanford, whose political consultant Jon Lerner has been working full-time these days to secure Sanford a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gov. Mark Sanford, whose political consultant Jon Lerner has been working full-time these days to secure Sanford a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senator Jake Knotts vs. Governornor Mark Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7560</link>
		<dc:creator>Senator Jake Knotts vs. Governornor Mark Sanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7560</guid>
		<description>Binden Plantation, Sen. Jake Knotts, and Gov. Mark Sanford 

Yemassee, SC sure is getting all excited over a bunch of pie in the sky promises.

Especially since the annexation of Binden Plantation is illegal.

On Wednesday, January 15, 2008, 
...right after Sandford's "State of the State" address at the Statehouse, SCETV interviewed Senator Jake Knotts and Knotts said in an interview that Governor Mark Sanford had interfered with the judiciary in Beaufort County. In reference to the matter he used the term "ex parte". Knotts went on to say that Sanford was also named as a defendant in a federal lawsuit yesterday.

"Ex parte" is a Latin legal term meaning "from (by or for) one party". 

"Ex parte" is also used more loosely to refer to improper unilateral contacts with a court, arbitrator or represented party without notice to the other party or counsel for that party.

BTW, I vote vote Sen. Jake Knotts for Governor, GO MR. KNOTTS!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Binden Plantation, Sen. Jake Knotts, and Gov. Mark Sanford </p>
<p>Yemassee, SC sure is getting all excited over a bunch of pie in the sky promises.</p>
<p>Especially since the annexation of Binden Plantation is illegal.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, January 15, 2008,<br />
&#8230;right after Sandford&#8217;s &#8220;State of the State&#8221; address at the Statehouse, SCETV interviewed Senator Jake Knotts and Knotts said in an interview that Governor Mark Sanford had interfered with the judiciary in Beaufort County. In reference to the matter he used the term &#8220;ex parte&#8221;. Knotts went on to say that Sanford was also named as a defendant in a federal lawsuit yesterday.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ex parte&#8221; is a Latin legal term meaning &#8220;from (by or for) one party&#8221;. </p>
<p>&#8220;Ex parte&#8221; is also used more loosely to refer to improper unilateral contacts with a court, arbitrator or represented party without notice to the other party or counsel for that party.</p>
<p>BTW, I vote vote Sen. Jake Knotts for Governor, GO MR. KNOTTS!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carroll A. Campbell III vs. Gov. Mark Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7459</link>
		<dc:creator>Carroll A. Campbell III vs. Gov. Mark Sanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7459</guid>
		<description>Fmr. governor's son Carroll Campbell, III sues Mark Sanford 

COLUMBIA, SC (WIS) - A former governor's son is suing the current governor after he was fired. 

Carroll Campbell, III has filed an appeal asking the state to reinstate him as a member of the State Ports Authority. 

Last week Governor Mark Sanford issued an executive order removing the former governor's son from that authority. 

Sanford claims Campbell's consulting firm presents the "appearance of a conflict of interest." 

Tuesday afternoon Campbell told WIS News 10 he's not sure what the governor is talking about. 

The governor wouldn't talk on camera about pending litigation. 

His spokesperson emailed a statement, saying, "if it is illegal for a lobbyist to serve on this board, why is it okay for someone who runs a lobbying firm to serve? It's not a violation of the letter of the law, but it certainly goes against the spirit of the law. The governor's action is on solid legal ground, and we frankly don't see any validity to the challenge." 

http://www.wistv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7629457</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fmr. governor&#8217;s son Carroll Campbell, III sues Mark Sanford </p>
<p>COLUMBIA, SC (WIS) - A former governor&#8217;s son is suing the current governor after he was fired. </p>
<p>Carroll Campbell, III has filed an appeal asking the state to reinstate him as a member of the State Ports Authority. </p>
<p>Last week Governor Mark Sanford issued an executive order removing the former governor&#8217;s son from that authority. </p>
<p>Sanford claims Campbell&#8217;s consulting firm presents the &#8220;appearance of a conflict of interest.&#8221; </p>
<p>Tuesday afternoon Campbell told WIS News 10 he&#8217;s not sure what the governor is talking about. </p>
<p>The governor wouldn&#8217;t talk on camera about pending litigation. </p>
<p>His spokesperson emailed a statement, saying, &#8220;if it is illegal for a lobbyist to serve on this board, why is it okay for someone who runs a lobbying firm to serve? It&#8217;s not a violation of the letter of the law, but it certainly goes against the spirit of the law. The governor&#8217;s action is on solid legal ground, and we frankly don&#8217;t see any validity to the challenge.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.wistv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7629457" rel="nofollow">http://www.wistv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7629457</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7375</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7375</guid>
		<description>Time magazine rated Sanford as the worst governor in America. They rated Huckabee as the best.  Yet another reason why I think we're not worthy of deserving this madman and genius in our highest office. And yet another reason why the analysis above is so sparklingly brilliant. SC is a microcosm of the national problem: Big Government Republicans.
I've heard all the rumors that Sanford was maneuvering to be Rudy's or Romney's VP nominee.  What a pipedream. Beasley and Campbell had similar fantasies. I even know about Sanford's staffers who went to work for Rudy.
But throughout the entire prez primary, Sanford has given only a few speeches, and in those speeches he has only mentioned one candidate for prez. He says they were very close friends in Congress, and that votes were often 433 to 2. They were the 2, and they sat in the back and talked smack together about all the other Congresshogs.
Anybody who really knows the Gov., knows that he 'tends' toward libertarian. So, my point? Sure, I know the redheaded stepchild running fo prez has problems in trying to relate, but why wouldn't an old friend like Sanford pipe up and help him out on some of that image problem?
I know, I know. Everybody's afraid the all-powerful, all-seeing, and ever-present GOP god in New York City.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time magazine rated Sanford as the worst governor in America. They rated Huckabee as the best.  Yet another reason why I think we&#8217;re not worthy of deserving this madman and genius in our highest office. And yet another reason why the analysis above is so sparklingly brilliant. SC is a microcosm of the national problem: Big Government Republicans.<br />
I&#8217;ve heard all the rumors that Sanford was maneuvering to be Rudy&#8217;s or Romney&#8217;s VP nominee.  What a pipedream. Beasley and Campbell had similar fantasies. I even know about Sanford&#8217;s staffers who went to work for Rudy.<br />
But throughout the entire prez primary, Sanford has given only a few speeches, and in those speeches he has only mentioned one candidate for prez. He says they were very close friends in Congress, and that votes were often 433 to 2. They were the 2, and they sat in the back and talked smack together about all the other Congresshogs.<br />
Anybody who really knows the Gov., knows that he &#8216;tends&#8217; toward libertarian. So, my point? Sure, I know the redheaded stepchild running fo prez has problems in trying to relate, but why wouldn&#8217;t an old friend like Sanford pipe up and help him out on some of that image problem?<br />
I know, I know. Everybody&#8217;s afraid the all-powerful, all-seeing, and ever-present GOP god in New York City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanfeld:  The Administration About Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7374</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanfeld:  The Administration About Nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7374</guid>
		<description>Could it simply be that the Creped Crewsader lacks what Cartman would call "disciprine" of the mind and spirit?  For an esoteric contrarian, it's all about the journey and how good you look along the way.   

His epic wonderlost in the wilds of South Carolina politics shall only be remembered for the distasteful skidmarks left on our community fabric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it simply be that the Creped Crewsader lacks what Cartman would call &#8220;disciprine&#8221; of the mind and spirit?  For an esoteric contrarian, it&#8217;s all about the journey and how good you look along the way.   </p>
<p>His epic wonderlost in the wilds of South Carolina politics shall only be remembered for the distasteful skidmarks left on our community fabric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New SLED Director and Gov. Mark Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7371</link>
		<dc:creator>New SLED Director and Gov. Mark Sanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7371</guid>
		<description>Director of SLED?
"...The governor decided late Thursday to pick Lloyd, who has no previous law enforcement experience..."

"...envisions a more hands-off approach than Stewart..."

Who does the Director of SLED report to?

http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2008/jan/12/u_s_attorney_picked_as_new_sled_chief27390/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Director of SLED?<br />
&#8220;&#8230;The governor decided late Thursday to pick Lloyd, who has no previous law enforcement experience&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;envisions a more hands-off approach than Stewart&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Who does the Director of SLED report to?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2008/jan/12/u_s_attorney_picked_as_new_sled_chief27390/" rel="nofollow">http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2008/jan/12/u_s_attorney_picked_as_new_sled_chief27390/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re:Carroll A. Campbell III vs. Gov. Mark Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7369</link>
		<dc:creator>re:Carroll A. Campbell III vs. Gov. Mark Sanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7369</guid>
		<description>Carroll A. Campbell III, son of former Gov. Carroll A. Campbell Jr. and an outspoken opponent to the idea of privatizing the state's marine terminals...but it also noted he and the governor apparently did not see eye to eye over the idea of privatizing of South Carolina's ports.

Campbell floated a proposal asking fellow board members, including Davis, to prevent the SPA from completely privatizing new terminals planned for North Charleston and in Jasper County.

Campbell reasoning was that if the SPA turned over its terminals to a private firm, nonunion SPA employees would be replaced by an all-union labor force, which in turn could raise operating costs, lead to work stoppages and make the port less competitive. But the state should never relinquish control of its marine terminals to private companies because they would become "100 percent unionized," Campbell said.

"I believe the governor wants to privatize everything," Campbell said.

Sawyer acknowledged that while Campbell's stand on privatization was a factor in Sanford's decision to remove him from the board...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carroll A. Campbell III, son of former Gov. Carroll A. Campbell Jr. and an outspoken opponent to the idea of privatizing the state&#8217;s marine terminals&#8230;but it also noted he and the governor apparently did not see eye to eye over the idea of privatizing of South Carolina&#8217;s ports.</p>
<p>Campbell floated a proposal asking fellow board members, including Davis, to prevent the SPA from completely privatizing new terminals planned for North Charleston and in Jasper County.</p>
<p>Campbell reasoning was that if the SPA turned over its terminals to a private firm, nonunion SPA employees would be replaced by an all-union labor force, which in turn could raise operating costs, lead to work stoppages and make the port less competitive. But the state should never relinquish control of its marine terminals to private companies because they would become &#8220;100 percent unionized,&#8221; Campbell said.</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe the governor wants to privatize everything,&#8221; Campbell said.</p>
<p>Sawyer acknowledged that while Campbell&#8217;s stand on privatization was a factor in Sanford&#8217;s decision to remove him from the board&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harden Gervais</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7351</link>
		<dc:creator>Harden Gervais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/01/14/inside-the-mind-of-mark-sanford/#comment-7351</guid>
		<description>Last time I checked, Sanford has accomplished exactly nothing. Only in South Carolina could failure mean success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I checked, Sanford has accomplished exactly nothing. Only in South Carolina could failure mean success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
