<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huckles Is Winning? WTF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:09:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Push Polls Are Here &#124; FITSNews For Now</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-7549</link>
		<dc:creator>The Push Polls Are Here &#124; FITSNews For Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-7549</guid>
		<description>[...] One such poll, a recorded message paid for by a group dubbing itself &#8220;Common Sense Issues,&#8221; attacked former Sen. Fred Thompson, Sen. John McCain and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, while praising former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One such poll, a recorded message paid for by a group dubbing itself &#8220;Common Sense Issues,&#8221; attacked former Sen. Fred Thompson, Sen. John McCain and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, while praising former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike's America</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-4663</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike's America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-4663</guid>
		<description>D. Jenkins: At some point we all have to come off the fence and compare and contrast how we view the candidates before we make a choice.

There are perfectly fair questions which need to be asked of all of them. None of them are perfect.

If the Fits folks want to toss a bit of humor, perhaps even snarky humor, into how they evaluate the candidates they should.

Of course, I&#039;m not known for being &quot;Mr. Nice Guy&quot; myself, so I&#039;m not about to go pointing fingers at others anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D. Jenkins: At some point we all have to come off the fence and compare and contrast how we view the candidates before we make a choice.</p>
<p>There are perfectly fair questions which need to be asked of all of them. None of them are perfect.</p>
<p>If the Fits folks want to toss a bit of humor, perhaps even snarky humor, into how they evaluate the candidates they should.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m not known for being &#8220;Mr. Nice Guy&#8221; myself, so I&#8217;m not about to go pointing fingers at others anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb O'Nare</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-4661</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb O'Nare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-4661</guid>
		<description>@ 12

Word</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 12</p>
<p>Word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harden Gervais</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-4657</link>
		<dc:creator>Harden Gervais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-4657</guid>
		<description>@ 11

Yeah, there&#039;s guys out there like that, but they&#039;re not polling over 10 percent (see: Richardson, Biden, Kucinich, Paul). The American people have spoken, and they want more bullshit, not less. Otherwise, how can you explain Clinton and Romney&#039;s poll numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 11</p>
<p>Yeah, there&#8217;s guys out there like that, but they&#8217;re not polling over 10 percent (see: Richardson, Biden, Kucinich, Paul). The American people have spoken, and they want more bullshit, not less. Otherwise, how can you explain Clinton and Romney&#8217;s poll numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb O'Nare</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-4655</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb O'Nare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-4655</guid>
		<description>&#039;If everyone â€œkeeps it realâ€ then we would have a bunch of Ron Pauls running for office&#039;

What a horrific fate! Could there be anything worse than straight forward, message driven candidates running for office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;If everyone â€œkeeps it realâ€ then we would have a bunch of Ron Pauls running for office&#8217;</p>
<p>What a horrific fate! Could there be anything worse than straight forward, message driven candidates running for office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-4656</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-4656</guid>
		<description>As if it were not clear from my earlier post, I am currently favoring Romney in the primaries. I agree that he seems â€œfakeâ€ not only on certain policy issues but also in appearance. However, I think that all presidential candidates are â€œfakeâ€ in some regard as they are attempting to win the support of the majority of a country made up of individuals with differing opinions and perspectives. If everyone â€œkeeps it realâ€ then we would have a bunch of Ron Pauls running for office, which may not be a bad thing but makes me a little uncomfortable. Furthermore, Dave Chappell has illustrated quite well the dangers of â€œkeeping it realâ€. Once in a blue moon you get a Ronald Reagan who can really shake things up, but this time around it looks like we (as in fellow reps) will have to settle for something less.

Thus, in 2008 I at least want a candidate whom I believe is of good character and sound judgment. Huckabee is a close second in my mind but something is still lacking. He appears to be a bit weak on experience and conviction and just doesnâ€™t feel â€œpresidentialâ€. He would make a hell of a vice pres though. Giuliani seems too sleazy and is frankly a little too much of a norâ€™easter for my taste. Unless a dark horse appears from the fog, I donâ€™t know what else is out there. Anyways, thatâ€™s my two cents. Thanks again for the great work and stay on top of the Supremes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if it were not clear from my earlier post, I am currently favoring Romney in the primaries. I agree that he seems â€œfakeâ€ not only on certain policy issues but also in appearance. However, I think that all presidential candidates are â€œfakeâ€ in some regard as they are attempting to win the support of the majority of a country made up of individuals with differing opinions and perspectives. If everyone â€œkeeps it realâ€ then we would have a bunch of Ron Pauls running for office, which may not be a bad thing but makes me a little uncomfortable. Furthermore, Dave Chappell has illustrated quite well the dangers of â€œkeeping it realâ€. Once in a blue moon you get a Ronald Reagan who can really shake things up, but this time around it looks like we (as in fellow reps) will have to settle for something less.</p>
<p>Thus, in 2008 I at least want a candidate whom I believe is of good character and sound judgment. Huckabee is a close second in my mind but something is still lacking. He appears to be a bit weak on experience and conviction and just doesnâ€™t feel â€œpresidentialâ€. He would make a hell of a vice pres though. Giuliani seems too sleazy and is frankly a little too much of a norâ€™easter for my taste. Unless a dark horse appears from the fog, I donâ€™t know what else is out there. Anyways, thatâ€™s my two cents. Thanks again for the great work and stay on top of the Supremes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FITSNews</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-4654</link>
		<dc:creator>FITSNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-4654</guid>
		<description>Mr. Jenkins,

We appreciate your comments. Thanks for submitting them ...

We don&#039;t really &quot;favor Huckabee&quot; because as we said, we&#039;ve got some real concerns about his record on fiscal issues. And as for the notion that we &quot;dislike Romney,&quot; that&#039;s not true either. We literally can&#039;t stand him, and frankly we think he&#039;s the fakest human being on the entire planet.

Having said all that, unlike other blogs here in South Carolina, we&#039;re not in anybody&#039;s &quot;presidential pocket,&quot; which has helped us tremendously in terms of legitimacy as well as facilitating our steady rise in traffic.

As an opinion site, people know we dislike certain candidates (and like certain other candidates), but they also know that nobody is immune from feeling the poison of our pens when they screw up, just as nobody is ever totally out of bounds for receiving praise when they get something right.

Again, though, thanks for taking the time to read and react. Your suggestions are good and your perspective is appreciated.

-FITSNews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Jenkins,</p>
<p>We appreciate your comments. Thanks for submitting them &#8230;</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t really &#8220;favor Huckabee&#8221; because as we said, we&#8217;ve got some real concerns about his record on fiscal issues. And as for the notion that we &#8220;dislike Romney,&#8221; that&#8217;s not true either. We literally can&#8217;t stand him, and frankly we think he&#8217;s the fakest human being on the entire planet.</p>
<p>Having said all that, unlike other blogs here in South Carolina, we&#8217;re not in anybody&#8217;s &#8220;presidential pocket,&#8221; which has helped us tremendously in terms of legitimacy as well as facilitating our steady rise in traffic.</p>
<p>As an opinion site, people know we dislike certain candidates (and like certain other candidates), but they also know that nobody is immune from feeling the poison of our pens when they screw up, just as nobody is ever totally out of bounds for receiving praise when they get something right.</p>
<p>Again, though, thanks for taking the time to read and react. Your suggestions are good and your perspective is appreciated.</p>
<p>-FITSNews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-4653</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-4653</guid>
		<description>FITSNews -

I have only been reading this blog for a few months and this is the first complaint I have. You have made it abundently clear that you dislike Romney and apparently seem to favor Huckabee. As I see it, all of the current rep. candidates have flaws, strengths and weakenesses. It is certainly within your discretion to endorse or oppose a primary candidate, but it doesn&#039;t help you reach a wider audience. I am sure that the readers of this blog vary widely on their choice for candidates. In my personal opinion you should stay above the fray on this one or at least attempt to be more objective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FITSNews -</p>
<p>I have only been reading this blog for a few months and this is the first complaint I have. You have made it abundently clear that you dislike Romney and apparently seem to favor Huckabee. As I see it, all of the current rep. candidates have flaws, strengths and weakenesses. It is certainly within your discretion to endorse or oppose a primary candidate, but it doesn&#8217;t help you reach a wider audience. I am sure that the readers of this blog vary widely on their choice for candidates. In my personal opinion you should stay above the fray on this one or at least attempt to be more objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pokey</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-4658</link>
		<dc:creator>pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-4658</guid>
		<description>hey, ron, we&#039;re in the middle of confirming reports you are a kucinich supporter.

just kidding ... spend more time enjoying the view here and stop taking this site so seriously, ok?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, ron, we&#8217;re in the middle of confirming reports you are a kucinich supporter.</p>
<p>just kidding &#8230; spend more time enjoying the view here and stop taking this site so seriously, ok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/12/06/huckles-is-winning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-4652</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=2252#comment-4652</guid>
		<description>No, Huck&#039;s fiscal conservative credentials do not exist. He&#039;s like a used car salesman---interesting until you realize he&#039;s monitoring your online bank account. Fiscally worse than Gov. Clinton, they say. And other than saying the Bible is a perfect literal word-for-word historical narrative, what else is conservative (as if that even counts)? Not on immigration. Not on education; his stance is &quot;Do it for the children. Not just conception to birth, but conception to the grave.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Huck&#8217;s fiscal conservative credentials do not exist. He&#8217;s like a used car salesman&#8212;interesting until you realize he&#8217;s monitoring your online bank account. Fiscally worse than Gov. Clinton, they say. And other than saying the Bible is a perfect literal word-for-word historical narrative, what else is conservative (as if that even counts)? Not on immigration. Not on education; his stance is &#8220;Do it for the children. Not just conception to birth, but conception to the grave.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
