The Hillary-Huma “Fantasy”
BISEXUAL BUZZ HAS RIGHT WINGERS FOAMING AT THE MOUTH
FITSNews – November 6, 2007 – Ever since we posted our original story about Huma Abedin, the stylishly smokin’ personal aide to Hillary Clinton, the FITSNews’ mailbox has literally been bombarded with e-mails suggesting that there’s a sexual relationship between the two women.
We’ve even heard from sources at rival Democratic presidential campaigns who claim that they “know it to be true” that Hill and Huma are romantically-involved, of course if we had a nickel for everytime somebody told us they knew something was true that turned out to be completely false, we’d have Sic Willie-type money.
The rumor gets traction in large part due to allegations disclosed years ago by Gennifer Flowers, the former mistress of President Bill Clinton. In Flowers’ autobiography, Passion and Betrayal, she alleges that the former President confided the secret of his wife’s bisexuality to her. Mix that little tidbit in with perpetual DC gossip and the religious right’s lust for anything that might derail Clinton’s candidacy, and you’ve got the makings of a massive web-based whispering campaign.
So is the Hillary-Huma hook-up fact or fantasy? Truth be told, as long as we get to keep posting pictures of Huma, we could care less. Aye Cabana Boy, people!
Comments
By gamecocks suck on November 6th, 2007 at 2:12 pm
I’d personally turn gay if I was married to Hillary. She is gross.
By Believe It Not on November 6th, 2007 at 4:45 pm
sic(k) will, you’ve always been a “drag queen” in waiting trying to look straight. We know your sister. She told us about the pantyhose. The bra. The shoes. She told us about the… Okay. PG13. Stop here.
By K. West on November 6th, 2007 at 7:24 pm
Of course you lefties don’t care if Hillary is following in Bill’s tradition by doing a young, attractive aide. I somehow think a large part of the voting public will have a problem with a 60-year-old cradle-robbing bulldyke as a candidate – gross indeed. Bye-bye, Hillary, hello Obama.
By Syd on November 6th, 2007 at 10:37 pm
Yeah, K. West, and obviously you right wingers prefer for your candidates to go after children — when they’re not using the justice department illegally or looting the treasury, of course.
You reprobates ought to be a little more careful about using someone’s sexuality as a political punching bag. You’ll lose that battle every time.
By Some one who cares on November 7th, 2007 at 4:51 am
K. west-
When did Bill “do” an attractive aide?
By Kevin Houston on November 7th, 2007 at 3:44 pm
As a Ron Paul supporter, can I just say “Please stop with the irrelevant personal attacks.”
I DON’T CARE if Hillary muff-dives. I care that she wants to institute nationalized medicine. I care that she wants to tax us all so she can give a fake $5000.00 bond to our children (a bond those children will have to pay for when they grow up.) I care that she doesn’t really want to take the troops out of Iraq. I care that her trade policies will make smoot-hawley look like something out of Ayn Rand’s wet dreams (talking free trade here, not sex.)
If you want to stop the politics of personal destruction, then help Ron Paul get the GOP nomination. He won’t stoop to personal attacks – he won’t have to. Hillary’s public policies are more than enough to lose the election for her.
By KC on November 15th, 2007 at 1:29 am
You know- Drudge (sometimes) gets fooled too- anyone remember the “secret” re: B Cs private parts that Poor Paula was going to testify to? That Clinton had a- wait for it- “doubled-headed eagle” tattooed on his weenie? I always thought Carville must’ve been having fun with that. Drudge printed it, and looked like a moron for doing so. I’m really reminded of that right now…
By Sally S. on November 25th, 2007 at 9:44 pm
I don’t want an angry dyke in the White House. I have two words for anyone whose planning to vote for Hillary – Rosie O’Donald.
By Stug on December 26th, 2007 at 5:42 pm
life’s a bitch, don’t elect one (or her lover)
By Santiago Matamoros on December 27th, 2007 at 7:53 am
Hillary is always picking these dark pubes out of her teeth and Huma always has gray ones between hers. They are an item.
By L on January 14th, 2008 at 1:48 am
Sick, vile and depraved. That is the only description for the posters here.
By L on January 14th, 2008 at 1:50 am
I don’t think any of you barbarians are past puberty. With so-called “men” like you on the loose, its a wonder that more women don’t turn lesbian. You are pissed because Hillary can get hotter chicks then you can.
By L on January 14th, 2008 at 1:54 am
I don’t think any of you barbarians are past puberty. With so-called “men” like you on the loose, its a wonder that more women don’t turn lesbian. You are pissed because Hillary can get hotter chicks then you.
As opposed to an angry straight woman like you sally s.? However I’m quite sure you are in the closet. Perhaps if you came out you would be less hostile and no longer sexually frustrated.
By az on January 16th, 2008 at 11:03 pm
First female and lesbian commander in chief, Hillary. This will make history.
By pw bob on April 29th, 2008 at 12:14 am
lolz, wow, u guys sem like a happy bunch…
me, i think its OBAMA ALL THE WAY!!!!!!!!
i din’t rlly care about the lesian stuff, i just think that obama owns all, hands down
also…
L has a sickmind, seeing everything as sexual, and i bet if she’s a girl, she’s probably lesbo too
By yolanda on April 30th, 2008 at 10:57 am
having clinton/for another term its back to communist time,those two will do angthing to will lie cheat,murder et al.and the voters will vote them in but we all get what we deserve another term of mourning for the glorious day of reagan.they inherited his polycies he lay down and they benifited from and had a good run now.i am sick in my stomach to go another term with that lot