Comments on: Hatin’ On Hill http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/10/29/hatin-on-hill/ Unfair ... Imbalanced Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:38:09 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Not Rick Quinn http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/10/29/hatin-on-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-3530 Not Rick Quinn Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:12:32 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1989#comment-3530 Ridonkulously large lead? Rudy as GOP frontrunner? Say, when's national primary day? Oh wait - there is no such thing as a national primary. So why talk about national polls? They're irrelevant. The latest poll out of Iowa has Hillary up 29-27 on Obama (within the margin of error) with Edwards in 3rd with 20. The same poll has Rudy tied for second in Iowa with Huckabee at 13 percent, with Mr. Electable Fred Thompson in third with 11. Romney's got a much more commanding lead in Iowa than Hillary does, and yet Romney gets treated like a third-rate candidate for some reason. Judd Gregg is endorsing him in New Hampshire. Mitt Romney is going to be the GOP nominee. Come on now. You know better than to get involved in all this national poll crap. Ridonkulously large lead? Rudy as GOP frontrunner?

Say, when’s national primary day?

Oh wait – there is no such thing as a national primary. So why talk about national polls? They’re irrelevant.

The latest poll out of Iowa has Hillary up 29-27 on Obama (within the margin of error) with Edwards in 3rd with 20.

The same poll has Rudy tied for second in Iowa with Huckabee at 13 percent, with Mr. Electable Fred Thompson in third with 11. Romney’s got a much more commanding lead in Iowa than Hillary does, and yet Romney gets treated like a third-rate candidate for some reason. Judd Gregg is endorsing him in New Hampshire. Mitt Romney is going to be the GOP nominee.

Come on now. You know better than to get involved in all this national poll crap.

]]>