Comments on: Rolling Stone On “No Surrender”

By: G.L.

G.L. — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 02:45:56 +0000

McCain is the obvious ideological successor to Bush. I know that sounds like a bad thing, but in South Carolina I don’t think it is because the latest polls showed his approval rating here to be around 70%.

By: LOL

LOL — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:04:24 +0000

We should trust McCain, well known for his hair-trigger-explosive outbursts, with the “car keys of a country”? Are you kidding? I wouldn’t trust him with the keys of my 1984 Chevy Cavalier.

Will, you clearly have some relation with the McCain campaign or its hired consultants–if not now, then certainly at some point in the past. A little disclosure would be nice.

By: GKP

GKP — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:41:15 +0000

…”what a great President he probably would’ve been.”

Aside from the whole “so-called ‘Bill of Rights,’” you mean? An interesting statement coming from someone who’s livelihood, and apparently passion, are tied to free speech.

Competence and good leadership go hand in hand. But sooner or later you have to ask the leader where he wants to take you. If it is down the arrogant road where our elected “betters” start telling us what we can and cannot say — which is exactly where Messrs. McCain and Feignold have/want to take us — then quite frankly I’ll take, well, just about anybody else.

By: Newspaper Hack

Newspaper Hack — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:27:26 +0000

I agree. As a Democrat, I didn’t volunteer for and work for McCain in the ’00 Virginia primary because of his beliefs. Far from it. But, I believed that he had that bumper sticker slogan, “the character to lead.” Something that, after seven years of Junior at the controls, Bush certainly doesn’t have. I can only imagine in what of a better place this country would be in year seven of a McCain administration.

By: Henry

Henry — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 04:37:03 +0000

a) Who reads Rolling Stone? Seriously, Will. Boasting that you made a point months before some rock-n-roll mag for teenagers to buy with their allowance money — that really doesn’t do you much credit, dude.

b) McCain is probably the first guy you’d trust “with the car keys of a country struggling to navigate its way through a difficult and dangerous new millennium”? As opposed to some other, less dangerous millennium? And what do you “navigate” with car keys, anyway?

c) The boy you quote from Rolling Stone writes, “in peacetime [McCain] would have blown away the likes of Romney and Giuliani on stature and credentials alone.” Hmm — not sure about that one. In peacetime he couldn’t even blow away the “likes” of George W. Bush. McCain’s whole problems is that he’s all “stature and credentials” and not much else other than MSM conventional wisdom with the odd conservative floor vote thrown in.

Oh, uh, hi Will. Sorry it’s been a while.

By: will sux

will sux — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 04:13:25 +0000

does this mean mccain will be receiving a “fitsnews” un-dorsement sic??? since you “trust him with the car keys” or whatever it was???

how much are mccain’s people paying for that??? whatever it is it can’t be worth it.