Shame on you for bagging out Ron Paul. Perhaps you should get to know his campain ideas before you smear this crap about him. Or maybe realise that your opinion is perhaps not the correct one. so go ahead and say Im coockoo, whatever. If x% of people actually listened to Ron Paul and voted for him, then x% of us should be thrown in the jacket and drugged up!

… why am I bothering replying to this?

what R-tard even wrote this article?

I kind of think some of the wingnuts that have adopted Ron Paul need serious psychiatric treatment for paranoia. That said, I am a Paul supporter to some degree. As a candidate, his domestic ideas are key. The fact is all the other candidates express ideas of larger government and more control at the federal level, albeit un-realistic Paul express the full opposite of that.
On foreign policy issues I disagree with Mr Paul.. I for one do not believe the US can withdraw from hotspots around the globe willy nilly and leave a vacuum.

We face serious issues, our economy I feel is teetering on an abyss, loose monetary policy is the biggest part of the problem. Paul recommends the return to a gold standard, in economic terms the cure would be worse then the disease. We have a country of spenders. US consumers have a net savings rate of -2%. where around the world, Japan for example has an after tax savings rate of 18%. Americans spend more then they earn. The issue for the individual as with the government is debt.

I know there are elements of the Ron Paul supporters who believe 9/11 was a conspiracy and believe this so vehemently that they accost “non-believers” for it. The Alex Jones, Lew Rockwell dope smoking diaper babies among them are among the worst of the lot. They are putting Ron Paul in a bad light just because they support him.

The other thing is RP is for a lot of reasons his own worst enemy. He has the charisma of the local dogcatcher, but his ideas of limited government is resonating with many of us. I disagree with others responding I do not believe he is capable of winning the general election but his presence in the election may influence content and course.

While I am all for free speech, I would caution the more vitriolic supporters to tone down the rhetoric. They are hurting Ron Paul.

He is the only conservative able to beat Hillary. Without him, we will have Hill at the Helm.

1. We do not like the idea of an N.A.U. Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. will merge into an EU style North American Union bureaucracy. New flag, and new currency called the “Amero”. We will lose our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, and our national soverignty. Mind you, there has so far not been one candidate to even acknowledge the existence of the efforts currently underway making this N.A.U. a reality in the near future. Ron Paul strongly opposes the N.A.U. and the NAFTA super highway already under construction in Texas. There are dozens of anti and pro N.A.U. websites please don’t take my word for it, just look it up for yourself. Oh, and don’t forget the mandatory microchips for all.

2. We recognize the fact that the IRS is a fraud and the government has no authority to tax us on the fruits of our labor. So does Ron Paul.

3. We know that we cannot continue to print money to finance undeclared no-win wars all over the world against an enemy that can never die. Printing money is the source of inflation, and is putting us on a collision course with destruction. Ron Paul is the only candidate who wants to bring the troops home, build a strong homeland defense and restore sound money. The other candidates do not even address these issues. They want to continue taxing us and printing money to police the world.

So my question to you is, do you really think the N.A.U. is a good thing? Losing our rights and exporting 40 million American jobs?

Do you think we should allow the government to illegally income tax us?

I just don’t understand how anyone could disagree with Ron Paul once they know the truth.

“Declare war if you want to go to war! Go to war, fight it and win it, but don’t get into it for political reasons or to enforce U.N. resolutions, or to pretend the Iraqi’s were a national threat to us.” -Ron Paul