<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treasurer Fight Showcases S.C. Executive-Legislative War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/08/01/treasurer-fight-showcases-sc-executive-legislative-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/08/01/treasurer-fight-showcases-sc-executive-legislative-war/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurin Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/08/01/treasurer-fight-showcases-sc-executive-legislative-war/#comment-2379</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurin Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1550#comment-2379</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a debate as to whether the Budget &amp; Control Board is, by design, a constitutional entity.  There&#039;s a strong argument to be made that it&#039;s a violation of separation of powers.  The South Carolina Supreme Court addressed this question in the case McLeod v. Edwards and found that the B &amp; C Board&#039;s design didn&#039;t violate the doctrine of separation of powers, but (if I remember correctly) one of the biggest factors in the Court&#039;s deeming it constitutional was that the majority of the Board is popularly elected statewide.  Now that the legislature is responsible for choosing Ravenel&#039;s replacement, the majority of the membership of the B &amp; C Board will no longer have been popularly elected statewide.  Rather, the majority will be comprised of members of the legislature and an individual of the legislature&#039;s choosing.

I&#039;m wondering if there will be a constitutional challenge and who would mount such a challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a debate as to whether the Budget &amp; Control Board is, by design, a constitutional entity.  There&#8217;s a strong argument to be made that it&#8217;s a violation of separation of powers.  The South Carolina Supreme Court addressed this question in the case McLeod v. Edwards and found that the B &amp; C Board&#8217;s design didn&#8217;t violate the doctrine of separation of powers, but (if I remember correctly) one of the biggest factors in the Court&#8217;s deeming it constitutional was that the majority of the Board is popularly elected statewide.  Now that the legislature is responsible for choosing Ravenel&#8217;s replacement, the majority of the membership of the B &amp; C Board will no longer have been popularly elected statewide.  Rather, the majority will be comprised of members of the legislature and an individual of the legislature&#8217;s choosing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering if there will be a constitutional challenge and who would mount such a challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reefer</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/08/01/treasurer-fight-showcases-sc-executive-legislative-war/#comment-2378</link>
		<dc:creator>Reefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1550#comment-2378</guid>
		<description>Dude - that&#039;s a lot of words.  Why can&#039;t we all just get along?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude &#8211; that&#8217;s a lot of words.  Why can&#8217;t we all just get along?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schotline</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/08/01/treasurer-fight-showcases-sc-executive-legislative-war/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>schotline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1550#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>http://schotlinepress.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/869/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://schotlinepress.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/869/" rel="nofollow">http://schotlinepress.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/869/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

