<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S.C. Governor Counting The Unemployed Himself Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/07/20/sc-governor-counting-the-unemployed-himself-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/07/20/sc-governor-counting-the-unemployed-himself-now/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:35:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silence Dogood</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/07/20/sc-governor-counting-the-unemployed-himself-now/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Dogood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1520#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>Hey Don Johnson, good thing nobody placed bets with you.  It looks like now that Sanford is counting the numbers, unemployment has &quot;surprisingly&quot; dropped

http://www.thestate.com/breaking/story/182990.html

Hey FITS, I know this is an old thread, but if you read this let us know if Sanford has taken over by now, or these numbers came out while it is still outside of his agency?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Don Johnson, good thing nobody placed bets with you.  It looks like now that Sanford is counting the numbers, unemployment has &#8220;surprisingly&#8221; dropped</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thestate.com/breaking/story/182990.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thestate.com/breaking/story/182990.html</a></p>
<p>Hey FITS, I know this is an old thread, but if you read this let us know if Sanford has taken over by now, or these numbers came out while it is still outside of his agency?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/07/20/sc-governor-counting-the-unemployed-himself-now/#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1520#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>So,

Who thinks unemployment will go down next month?  What&#039;ll you give me... 2-to-1 odds?  1.5-to-1?  1-to-1?  Come on folks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So,</p>
<p>Who thinks unemployment will go down next month?  What&#8217;ll you give me&#8230; 2-to-1 odds?  1.5-to-1?  1-to-1?  Come on folks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silence Dogood</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/07/20/sc-governor-counting-the-unemployed-himself-now/#comment-2290</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Dogood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1520#comment-2290</guid>
		<description>&quot;Trust me, I&#039;ll do my own oversight&quot;

Something about the power being in &quot;he who counts the votes&quot; by some guy in Russia? There migh be a correlation here.

I am not claiming Sanford or the department under his direct control would miscount or cacluate these numbers in order to be beneficial to him - but it should raise a red flag when some one takes oversight into their own hands from a likely more independent agency, did Mark state why he felt it was better for him to take the reigns of this away from the commission?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Trust me, I&#8217;ll do my own oversight&#8221;</p>
<p>Something about the power being in &#8220;he who counts the votes&#8221; by some guy in Russia? There migh be a correlation here.</p>
<p>I am not claiming Sanford or the department under his direct control would miscount or cacluate these numbers in order to be beneficial to him &#8211; but it should raise a red flag when some one takes oversight into their own hands from a likely more independent agency, did Mark state why he felt it was better for him to take the reigns of this away from the commission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

