Comments on: Playing The Triangle Isn’t Easy http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/ Politics, Sports and Pop Culture Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:55:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: The Aiken Hornet http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1588 The Aiken Hornet Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:59:15 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1588 What is the "national Congress"? What is the “national Congress”?

]]> By: tammy http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1578 tammy Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:37:45 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1578 again...that "ultra liberal" term. Are you in the pocket of the PFC nutjobs? When the SC legislature starts implementing rights for gays and education for poor blacks...I might accept the term "ultra liberal." Until then...do share with us...what ARE you smoking? again…that “ultra liberal” term. Are you in the pocket of the PFC nutjobs?

When the SC legislature starts implementing rights for gays and education for poor blacks…I might accept the term “ultra liberal.”

Until then…do share with us…what ARE you smoking?

]]> By: Silence Dogood http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1579 Silence Dogood Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:33:14 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1579 Trawlerman, don't get it. I guess I am one of those fools who doesn't even realize it. I'm just a tough cookie to convince that the S.C. legislature is "ultra-liberal" even fiscally speaking since without raisng taxes the state has surpluses? I assume your definition of fiscal conservatism is cutting taxes and making sure the state has huge deficits and debt? I'll take it you are an economist, because this old fool just doesn't get it anymore. Trawlerman, don’t get it. I guess I am one of those fools who doesn’t even realize it. I’m just a tough cookie to convince that the S.C. legislature is “ultra-liberal” even fiscally speaking since without raisng taxes the state has surpluses?

I assume your definition of fiscal conservatism is cutting taxes and making sure the state has huge deficits and debt? I’ll take it you are an economist, because this old fool just doesn’t get it anymore.

]]> By: The Trawlerman http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1587 The Trawlerman Thu, 31 May 2007 18:14:53 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1587 Silence, just slink off somewhere to lick your wounds. You are making a fool of yourself. Silence, just slink off somewhere to lick your wounds. You are making a fool of yourself.

]]> By: Silence Dogood http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1582 Silence Dogood Wed, 30 May 2007 20:01:06 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1582 Oh I forgot, fiscal responsiblity is no longer measured by matching income and spending it is done sheerly on how many taxes you cut despte the debt or deficits (I was thinking of fiscal conservatives from years ago). Oh I forgot, fiscal responsiblity is no longer measured by matching income and spending it is done sheerly on how many taxes you cut despte the debt or deficits (I was thinking of fiscal conservatives from years ago).

]]> By: Silence Dogood http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1581 Silence Dogood Wed, 30 May 2007 19:59:00 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1581 Oh Goodness, I made a spelling error! retract my comments! OK, maybe don't retract them, on second thought consider that fiscal conservatives no longer have a party. Check out the spending (while cutting taxes) of the U.S. Congress over the past 12 years. . .if big spending is all it means to be liberal, or "ultra-liberal" then there are indeed practially no "conservatives" still around. So by this measure you consider the S.C. Senate to be one of the most liberal in the country. I would assume the very meaningful term "ulta-liberal" would have to mean 'more liberal than..." something or some one else? Again I say "puposterous!" Puposterous: 1. preposterous in a, slightyly dogmatic, almost puppy doggish way. 2. Posts made by a puppy dog or the like. 3. Blatant miss spelling by typo challenged commenter This is great, S.C. has a huge surplus and you think the S.C. legislature is fiscally irresponsbile, yet the national Congress continues to grow larger and larger budget over the past 6 years - were they more or less "ultra liberal" by your standard than the S.C. Senate? Oh Goodness, I made a spelling error! retract my comments!

OK, maybe don’t retract them, on second thought consider that fiscal conservatives no longer have a party. Check out the spending (while cutting taxes) of the U.S. Congress over the past 12 years. . .if big spending is all it means to be liberal, or “ultra-liberal” then there are indeed practially no “conservatives” still around.

So by this measure you consider the S.C. Senate to be one of the most liberal in the country. I would assume the very meaningful term “ulta-liberal” would have to mean ‘more liberal than…” something or some one else?

Again I say “puposterous!”

Puposterous: 1. preposterous in a, slightyly dogmatic, almost puppy doggish way. 2. Posts made by a puppy dog or the like. 3. Blatant miss spelling by typo challenged commenter

This is great, S.C. has a huge surplus and you think the S.C. legislature is fiscally irresponsbile, yet the national Congress continues to grow larger and larger budget over the past 6 years – were they more or less “ultra liberal” by your standard than the S.C. Senate?

]]> By: FITSNews http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1580 FITSNews Wed, 30 May 2007 19:35:36 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1580 Bush's record on spending is atrocious with or without the Iraq War. Just because he's Commanderer-in-Chief of the Moral Majority doesn't make him a fiscal conservative. -FITSNews Bush’s record on spending is atrocious with or without the Iraq War. Just because he’s Commanderer-in-Chief of the Moral Majority doesn’t make him a fiscal conservative.

-FITSNews

]]> By: yep http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1583 yep Wed, 30 May 2007 18:41:15 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1583 So liberals want to grow government, ok. So far so good. And growth is measured by spending, ok, still ok. So, according to normalized federal spending trends, Bush's decision to engage our troops in Iraq means he has grown government more (and is therefore more liberal) than any president since FDR. No? Sorry, I forgot to put Libertarian double standards into the equation. Maybe you've overgeneralized a little on this one. So liberals want to grow government, ok. So far so good. And growth is measured by spending, ok, still ok. So, according to normalized federal spending trends, Bush’s decision to engage our troops in Iraq means he has grown government more (and is therefore more liberal) than any president since FDR. No? Sorry, I forgot to put Libertarian double standards into the equation. Maybe you’ve overgeneralized a little on this one.

]]> By: Don Johnson http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1586 Don Johnson Wed, 30 May 2007 18:02:28 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1586 I NEED MORE COWBELL! I NEED MORE COWBELL!

]]> By: FITSNews http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/30/playing-the-triangle-isnt-easy/#comment-1585 FITSNews Wed, 30 May 2007 17:12:48 +0000 http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1211#comment-1585 "Puposterous" is what we say when our puppies ask to go outside and then don't do anything. We assume you meant preposterous. And you're right, Silence, growing government by 40% over the last 4 years probably isn't "ultra-liberal." -FITSNews “Puposterous” is what we say when our puppies ask to go outside and then don’t do anything. We assume you meant preposterous.

And you’re right, Silence, growing government by 40% over the last 4 years probably isn’t “ultra-liberal.”

-FITSNews

]]>