<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitt Romney Loves Babies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/14/mitt-romney-loves-babies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/14/mitt-romney-loves-babies/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:51:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Money Can&#8217;t Buy Mitt Love &#171; FITSNews For Now</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/14/mitt-romney-loves-babies/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Can&#8217;t Buy Mitt Love &#171; FITSNews For Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1114#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>[...] and campaign contribution information are to be believed, absolutely not. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who currently sits in fourth place in most Palmetto State polls, nonetheless leads the rest of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and campaign contribution information are to be believed, absolutely not. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who currently sits in fourth place in most Palmetto State polls, nonetheless leads the rest of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GKP</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/14/mitt-romney-loves-babies/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>GKP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1114#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>They can both be right...but not under the 6,000 years = 1 day theory. I am pretty sure that math doesn&#039;t get you to the couple billion years you need to measure the age of the earth.

Bottom line:  if you believe the Old Testament is a science text book (and, for example, Sarah was about 90 when Isaac was born, and Jonah lived inside the whale for 3 days) then you are going to have a real tough time with  evolution (and more accurately, natural selection).

If you believe the that Old Testament is allegorical (and my Church taught me that I could -- as long as I believed the factual nature of the New Testament) then it is fairly easy to reconcile natural selection/evolution and Christian faith.

However, my guess is we lost  a good many presidential candidates after about line 3 of this comment....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can both be right&#8230;but not under the 6,000 years = 1 day theory. I am pretty sure that math doesn&#8217;t get you to the couple billion years you need to measure the age of the earth.</p>
<p>Bottom line:  if you believe the Old Testament is a science text book (and, for example, Sarah was about 90 when Isaac was born, and Jonah lived inside the whale for 3 days) then you are going to have a real tough time with  evolution (and more accurately, natural selection).</p>
<p>If you believe the that Old Testament is allegorical (and my Church taught me that I could &#8212; as long as I believed the factual nature of the New Testament) then it is fairly easy to reconcile natural selection/evolution and Christian faith.</p>
<p>However, my guess is we lost  a good many presidential candidates after about line 3 of this comment&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yep</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/14/mitt-romney-loves-babies/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>yep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1114#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>can&#039;t evolution and the bible both be right? Genesis starts off with God creating the world in seven days but couldn&#039;t a day to God be several years?  If so, does this work?  Many have heard the argument that the word &quot;day&quot; in Genesis does not mean a literal 24 hour type day, but  that the &quot;days&quot; represent 6 ages of successive time periods. (6,000 years) After all how could Adam have named all of the animals on the sixth day in 24 hours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t evolution and the bible both be right? Genesis starts off with God creating the world in seven days but couldn&#8217;t a day to God be several years?  If so, does this work?  Many have heard the argument that the word &#8220;day&#8221; in Genesis does not mean a literal 24 hour type day, but  that the &#8220;days&#8221; represent 6 ages of successive time periods. (6,000 years) After all how could Adam have named all of the animals on the sixth day in 24 hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newspaper Hack</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/05/14/mitt-romney-loves-babies/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>Newspaper Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 03:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=1114#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>They have to do it outside a grocery store for the chapstick. When you&#039;re kissing that much fundy ass (seriously, three major presidential candidates don&#039;t believe in evolution?) your lips get mighty chapped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have to do it outside a grocery store for the chapstick. When you&#8217;re kissing that much fundy ass (seriously, three major presidential candidates don&#8217;t believe in evolution?) your lips get mighty chapped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
