NASA Love Triangle Just Isn’t Sexy
STAR-CROSSED LOVERS PROBABLY FIGHTING OVER ALGORITHMS, RATIOS, POCKET PROTECTORS
FITSNews – February 7, 2007 – With the exception of a love triangle over at the assisted living community (where Sic Willie performs Burt Bacharach favorites three times a week), this is about the unsexiest thing we could think of.
A NASA love triangle? Seriously?
This is probably going to turn into one of those made for TV movies where John Stamos and Kirstie Alley have a zero-gravity love scene beneath a canopy of stars while promising each other that no one will find out about their forbidden love. Because that’s sexy, people.
Comments
By ells bells on February 7th, 2007 at 11:37 am
You’ve started sounding bitter lately in your blogs. I would think you of all people would find a love triangle sexy because you’d think you could convince all parties to participate at the same time.. regardless of their chosen occupation.
What makes this story stick out to you more so than the recent skydiving murder by a jealous side of that triangle?
By *jcg on February 7th, 2007 at 12:23 pm
the diapers. definitely the diapers.
By Earl on February 7th, 2007 at 2:13 pm
Well, it’s just more proof when you want a crazed, violent love triangle, complete with kidnap and murder plots, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist.
… on second thought, maybe it does!