<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Sanford Sellout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/02/06/another-sanford-sellout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/02/06/another-sanford-sellout/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/02/06/another-sanford-sellout/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=465#comment-400</guid>
		<description>fair enough, but i said "looks like sour grapes." and it does look like it. appearances count for a lot, which you of all people ought to know.

not everybody has read everything sic willie has written about the governor (does that surprise you?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fair enough, but i said &#8220;looks like sour grapes.&#8221; and it does look like it. appearances count for a lot, which you of all people ought to know.</p>
<p>not everybody has read everything sic willie has written about the governor (does that surprise you?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitsnews</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/02/06/another-sanford-sellout/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>fitsnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=465#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Jackie-

Perhaps you missed one of the three statewide opinion editorials Sic Willie wrote and got published defending the governor against his many detractors - all three of which came MONTHS AFTER the governor threw Sic Willie under the bus on a personal level.

Or the dozens of blog entries on the old FaithintheSound sticking up for the governor and his ideas against a recalcitrant, obtuse legislative branch.

Sour grapes? Please.

We understand that "attacking the messenger" is part of the Governor's Office strategy for dealing with this latest f*ck up on their part, but you can't say Sic Willie didn't continue to persistently, passionately and publicly go to bat for the governor long after Sanford deposited a knife in his back.

Thanks for your comment, though.

-FITSNews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackie-</p>
<p>Perhaps you missed one of the three statewide opinion editorials Sic Willie wrote and got published defending the governor against his many detractors - all three of which came MONTHS AFTER the governor threw Sic Willie under the bus on a personal level.</p>
<p>Or the dozens of blog entries on the old FaithintheSound sticking up for the governor and his ideas against a recalcitrant, obtuse legislative branch.</p>
<p>Sour grapes? Please.</p>
<p>We understand that &#8220;attacking the messenger&#8221; is part of the Governor&#8217;s Office strategy for dealing with this latest f*ck up on their part, but you can&#8217;t say Sic Willie didn&#8217;t continue to persistently, passionately and publicly go to bat for the governor long after Sanford deposited a knife in his back.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment, though.</p>
<p>-FITSNews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/02/06/another-sanford-sellout/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=465#comment-401</guid>
		<description>willie- maybe the guv has problems with loyalty, as you say. but maybe you're not the best one to comment on that subject. looks like sour grapes, is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>willie- maybe the guv has problems with loyalty, as you say. but maybe you&#8217;re not the best one to comment on that subject. looks like sour grapes, is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald W</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/02/06/another-sanford-sellout/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=465#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Sanford is a great example of someone that was good in Congress (legislative branch skills) ....

but sucks as Guv (executive skills).

I voted for him twice, and like him personally...but just can not understand what he is doing? Does he come up with this stuff himself? Or is it his staff? Or wife?

What’s up wit dis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanford is a great example of someone that was good in Congress (legislative branch skills) &#8230;.</p>
<p>but sucks as Guv (executive skills).</p>
<p>I voted for him twice, and like him personally&#8230;but just can not understand what he is doing? Does he come up with this stuff himself? Or is it his staff? Or wife?</p>
<p>What’s up wit dis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reconstructed</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/02/06/another-sanford-sellout/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Reconstructed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=465#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Wow, if he actually had all agencies and Constitutional officers under his belt think of the disasterous effects he could have. That is why many people like their portfolio in government as diversified as their portfolios.Indeed, there is a management fee on a mutual fund , but it is less risk than one stock, and well worth it in a conservative government as well as conservative portfolio that is the investment of the people by the people.

It appears we should once again put the Insurance Commissioners office back on the ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, if he actually had all agencies and Constitutional officers under his belt think of the disasterous effects he could have. That is why many people like their portfolio in government as diversified as their portfolios.Indeed, there is a management fee on a mutual fund , but it is less risk than one stock, and well worth it in a conservative government as well as conservative portfolio that is the investment of the people by the people.</p>
<p>It appears we should once again put the Insurance Commissioners office back on the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald W</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/02/06/another-sanford-sellout/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 02:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=465#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Whats up with this guy Sandford? Does the Guv ever get drug tested?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats up with this guy Sandford? Does the Guv ever get drug tested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
