<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huckleberry&#8217;s In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/01/29/huckleberrys-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/01/29/huckleberrys-in/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:38:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huckabee Hunts For Votes in SC &#171; FITSNews For Now</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/01/29/huckleberrys-in/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Huckabee Hunts For Votes in SC &#171; FITSNews For Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=408#comment-358</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote awhile back of our appreciation for this distinctly non-political politician, who dropped by the FITSNews booth en route to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote awhile back of our appreciation for this distinctly non-political politician, who dropped by the FITSNews booth en route to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2007/01/29/huckleberrys-in/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.161/~fitsnews/?p=408#comment-359</guid>
		<description>In January 1991, Bill Clinton had 2 percent of the vote in a Gallup Poll (according to a Gallup blog on USA Today posted a few weeks ago).

Just because you haven&#039;t heard of someone doesn&#039;t mean they won&#039;t be a good presidential candidate.

Besides, with the exception of his tax hike in Arkansas, Huckabee might be the most &quot;real&quot; candidate out there.

And you have to respect the personal fortitude it takes to drop 100 pounds and run a marathon.  That isn&#039;t anything presidential, but it shows the character of someone.  Besides, look at all the fatasses out there (like me) who can&#039;t drop their mocha frapps (FITS) and lose ONE stinking pound structly by walking across the street.

But I&#039;m not bitter or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In January 1991, Bill Clinton had 2 percent of the vote in a Gallup Poll (according to a Gallup blog on USA Today posted a few weeks ago).</p>
<p>Just because you haven&#8217;t heard of someone doesn&#8217;t mean they won&#8217;t be a good presidential candidate.</p>
<p>Besides, with the exception of his tax hike in Arkansas, Huckabee might be the most &#8220;real&#8221; candidate out there.</p>
<p>And you have to respect the personal fortitude it takes to drop 100 pounds and run a marathon.  That isn&#8217;t anything presidential, but it shows the character of someone.  Besides, look at all the fatasses out there (like me) who can&#8217;t drop their mocha frapps (FITS) and lose ONE stinking pound structly by walking across the street.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not bitter or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
